Saturday, 31 August 2013

Staffordshire Heritage Day 2013 : Staffordshire 913

Staffordshire 913  are celebrating 1100 years of the founding of the Stafford Burh and planning a day of talks by experts on the Saxon period, including demonstrations by The Poor Cnichts of St Chad.

Æthelflæd and the Mercians at Stafford
Last month Stafford saw Big Burh Day celebrations in the Market Square and Victoria Park. Now Staffordshire Heritage Group, an umbrella organisation for history, archive and archaeology groups throughout the county, is organising its first Heritage Day on the theme of the town's Anglo Saxon origins. Following the success of its history fairs, held every two years, a day of talks has been set up for 7th September, at Castle Church Hall,  Newport Road, Stafford, ST16 1DP.

Stafford 913
Steve Dean, Principal Archaeologist of Staffordshire, will set the scene for the day by giving his ‘Stafford 913’ talk, describing the Burh of Stafford, including an update on the recent excavations and continuing progress on the Staffordshire Hoard restoration work.

The Poor Cnichts of St Chad
The Stafford based group, The Poor Cnichts of St Chad, a historical re-enactment group who work and re-create life in Britain in the 10th and 11th centuries, will describe life in Anglo-Saxon times through a talk and various artefacts, demonstrating trades and general way of life. (Cnichts with a 'C' - 'Cnight' is the Anglo Saxon spelling of Knight they say).

Made Worthy by Weapons: Warfare in the Time of the Hoard
After a buffet lunch and opportunity to examine artefacts and browse at the bookstall, Steve Pollington will deliver his talk ‘Made Worthy by Weapons: Warfare in the Time of the Hoard’ will present an overview of the social context of warfare in the pre-Christian and post-Conversion age, focusing on how and why people fought, what they fought with. Including a display of weaponry.

The Anglo-Saxon Landscape
Following a break for tea Della Hooke, from Birmingham University, an expert on Anglo-Saxon Landscape, will talk generally about her subject and offer an insight into Stafford’s relationship with its wider Anglo-Saxon landscape.


Tickets : £15.00, from Staffordshire Heritage Group. Price includes refreshments and lunch.
For a booking form and further information visit the website of the Staffordshire Heritage Group.



* * *



Saturday, 3 August 2013

King Alfred and the Anglo-Saxons

As my home town of Stafford celebrates 1100 years since its founding by Æthelflæd, The Lady of Mercians this summer, it is with perfect timing that historian Michael Wood presents a new three-part series on BBC Four on the story of King Alfred the Great and his struggles against the Danes. Wood argues that Alfred and his descendants were England's most influential and important rulers.

In Michael Wood's television debut back in 1980 he focused on Alfred the Great as part of the series In Search Of The Dark Ages. Wood now returns to Alfred in a major three-part television series on BBC Four commencing next Tuesday 6th August at 9.00 pm. King Alfred and the Anglo-Saxons examines the careers of King Alfred the Great, the Lady Æthelflæd, his daughter, and King Athelstan, his grandson and first king of all England.

Alfred the Great, probably the best-known Anglo-Saxon king, reigned 871–899, is famously remembered for burning the cakes. The son of King Æthelwulf of Wessex, Alfred succeeded his three older brothers to the throne in 871. At that time, Danish invaders had conquered much of England, and Alfred struggled to prevent Wessex from succumbing to the same fate.

From his retreat to The Isle of Athelney in the Somerset marshes, Alfred launched the Anglo-Saxon recovery leading to the decisive victory over the Great Heathen Army of Guthrum at the Battle of Edington in May 878. King Alfred went on to establish towns, trade and coinage, reviving learning and literacy, laying the foundations of a single kingdom of 'all the English'.

Episode 1 – Alfred Of Wessex, 6 August 
The first episode of the series shows Alfred fighting a desperate guerrilla war from the marshes of Somerset leading to the battle at Edington.  Filmed on location from Reading to Rome, using original texts read in Old English, and interviews with leading scholars, Michael Wood describes a man who was ‘not just the greatest Briton, but one of the greatest rulers of any time or place’.

Episode 2 – The Lady Of The Mercians,  13 August
The second episode sees Alfred’s children continue the family plan to create a kingdom of all the English. The tale begins with a savage Civil War in a bleak decade of snow and famine, culminating in an epic victory over the Vikings near Wolverhampton in 910. The key figure in this episode is Alfred’s daughter Æthelflæd, the ruler of Mercia. Michael Wood recovers her story from a copy of a lost chronicle written in Mercia in her lifetime. One of the great forgotten figures in British history, Æthelflæd led armies, built fortresses, campaigned against the Danes and was a brilliant diplomat. Her fame spread across the British Isles, beloved by her warriors and her people she was known simply as 'The Lady of the Mercians’. Wood concludes that without her ‘England might never have happened’.

Episode 3 – Æthelstan: The First King Of England, 20 August.
In the third episode, Alfred’s grandson Æthelstan fulfils the family plan and creates a kingdom of all England. Here Wood tells of Æthelstan’s wars, his learning and his lawmaking and shows how he created a national coinage and traces the origin of the English Parliament to the king’s new assembly politics. But there’s also a dark side, with later legends that the king had his brother drowned at sea. In his last desperate struggle, Æthelstan defeated a huge invasion of Danes and Scots in what became known as the Anglo‐Saxon ‘Great War’. Wood argues, Æthelstan was one of the greatest English monarchs, and with his grandfather Alfred, his father Edward and his aunt Æthelflæd, a member of our most remarkable royal family, and ‘even more than the Tudors, the most gifted and influential rulers in British history’.


The statue of King Alfred the Great at the eastern end of The Broadway, 
Winchester, near to the site of the city's medieval East Gate, 
erected in 1899 to mark one thousand years since Alfred's death.



* * *

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

Æthelflæd: The Making of a County Town

"913. Here God helping, Æthelflæd, Lady of Mercians, went with all the Mercians to Tamworth and then built the stronghold there early in the summer, and afterwards, before Lammas, that at Stafford.”1

July 2013 marks the 1,100 anniversary since Æthelflæd the Lady of the Mercians, daughter of King Alfred the Great, built fortifications at Stafford during the summer of 913 AD as a crucial part of the campaign for the recovery of England from the Danes.

The Norsemen Cometh
The Viking Age began dramatically in England on 8 June 793 when raiders  in longships from across the North Sea attacked and destroyed the abbey on the island of Lindisfarne. The sheer shock and awe of the devastation of Northumbria's Holy Island caused feelings of anxiety and terror throughout the Christian west and is now often taken as the beginning of the Viking Age. The Northumbrian scholar, Alcuin of York claimed, "Never before has such an atrocity been seen”.

Waves of Danish assaults on the coastlines of the British Isles continued until the autumn of 865 AD when the Great Heathen Army of Ivar Ragnarsson (The Boneless) invaded East Anglia and over-wintered there after they demanded and received tribute in exchange for a temporary peace. The Danes now seemed intent on settlement. The following year the Danes moved north and took York from the Northumbrians, renaming the city 'Jorvik'. The following year, 867, the Danes held out against a failed attempt by the Northumbrians to retake the city. Three years later they ventured into Wessex and put King Æthelred and Alfred to flight at Reading. By 875 the Danes had ventured deep inside of Alfred’s Kingdom of Wessex and settled in Dorset.

In 884 Alfred made a treaty with the Danish leader Guthrum, which established the boundaries of the Danelaw; an area of England which effectively permitted Danish self-rule and the laws of the "Danes" held sway over "West Saxon law" and "Mercian law".

The term has been extended by historians for the 'Danelaw' to be a geographical area of northern and eastern England comprising some 15 shires from Yorkshire to Essex, including the east Midlands, north of a demarcation line running roughly from London to Chester. However, the Treaty provided opportunity for Alfred to consolidate his power in Wessex with his son and daughter Edward the Elder and Æthelflæd, the Lady of the Mercians.

The Lady of the Mercians
In a series of campaigns in the 910s, Edward the Elder and Æthelflæd conquered Danish territories in the Midlands and East Anglia. Æthelflæd is documented in the Anglo Saxon Chronicle as being responsible for constructing several burhs along the boundary territory of the Danelaw.

The Old English word burh meaning a fortified and walled enclosure containing several households, could be anything from a large stockade to a fortified town, and has since developed further into the larger administrative areas known as Boroughs.

Wikimedia Commons 
The Five Boroughs of the Danelaw were the main towns of Danish Mercia in the East Midlands. These were Derby, Leicester, Lincoln, Nottingham and Stamford. They began as the fortified burhs of five Danish armies who settled the area and ruled as a Danish 'Jarldom'. With the exception of Stamford they later become county towns, administrative centres of their respective Shires.

These five fortified towns became particularly important in the reconquest of the Danelaw by the English under Æthelflæd of Mercia and Edward the Elder of Wessex during 916 and 917. The area was subsequently ruled by the Earls of Mercia. Æthelflæd recoverd two of the Five Boroughs (Derby and Leicester). These attacks were probably launched from the burhs in the West Midlands established by the Lady of the Mercians; Bromesberrow, Stafford, Tamworth, Warwick, and Runcorn.

Æthelflæd first appears n the Anglo Saxon Chronicle in 909:2 

“Here the Mercians and West Saxons fought against the raiding-army near Tettenhall on 6 August and had the victory. And the same year Æthelflæd built Bremesburh.3

After harrying through Mercia, the raiding-army crossed the Severn into the west country. On crossing back over the Severn bridge at Bridgnorth the Danes were attacked by Mercians and West Saxons who gained a great victory at Woden's Field (Wednesfield, just three miles to the east of Tettenhall) killing three Viking kings, including Eowils and Healfdan, who with other jarls and noblemen were 'hastened to the hall of the infernal one.'4

This decisive battle reads like a total massacre of the Danes, with their chiefs and kings being slaughtered in a great Mercian victory led by Æthelred and his wife Æthelflæda with troops of Edward the Elder. It opened the way for the expansion of Wessex into the Danish east Mercia & East Anglia; the Northumbrian Danes effectively subdued, never to recover, ultimately paving the way for Edward's son Æthelstan to become the first ever King of all England after recovering York in 927. The English Viking Age came to a close in 1066 when Harald Hardrada landed with an army with ambitions of taking York and the English crown with it. He was defeated and killed at the Battle of Stamford Bridge.

A year after Tettenhall Æthelred, leader of the Mercians, was dead. Hereafter, Æthelflæd is referred to as 'The Lady of the Mercans', seemingly a title accorded only after the ealdorman's death.5 Æthelflæd is recorded as building a stronghold at Scergeat 6 and Bridgnorth in 912. The following year she “went with all the Mercians to Tamworth and then built the stronghold there early in the summer, and afterwards, before Lammas, that at Stafford.”

In 914 Æthelflæd constructed the strongholds at Eddisbury and Warwick. The following year constructed the fortifications at Chirbury (Shropshre), Weardbyrg (possibly Warburton on the south bank of the Mersey) and completed Runcorn before mid-winter. In 916 “Æthelflæd sent an army into Wales and broke down Brecon Mere”. The next year, the Chronicle records that Æthelflæd took possession of the stronghold of Derby. By 918 Æthelflæd had made further in-roads into the The Five Boroughs and took control the stronghold of Leicester and ejected the raiding-parties there.

It seems York was her next target, as the Chronicle records the people there had pledged their allegiance to the Lady of the Mercians, but 12 days before mid-summer she suddenly died at Tamworth, “the eighth year of her rightful Lordship over Mercia.” It appears her daughter, Ælfwynn, took control of Mercia for a short period after her death; three weeks before Christmas she was led into Wessex and all but disappears from the historical record. A Charter (S 535) of 948 records a grant of 6 hides at Wickhambreux, Kent, by King Eadred to “Ælfwyn, a religious woman”, which, if the same person as seems likely, may indicate that she had entered holy orders.
The Æthelflæd Monument at Tamworth.
The 'Lady of the Mercians' with her nephew Æthelstan
The young Æthelstan spent much of his time at the Mercian court of his aunt and uncle, Æthelflæd and Æthelred; the young prince no doubt gained much military experience during the Mercian campaigns recovering the Danelaw. In 925 Æthelstan gave a charter of privileges to St Oswald's Priory, Gloucester, where Æthelred and Æthelflæd, The Lady of the Mercians were buried in the east side-chapel of St Peter's Church.

The role Æthelflæd, the Lady of the Mercians, played in the recovery of England from the Danes should not be underestimated; she was a true warrior queen.


See also: King Alfred and the Anglo-Saxons (Michael Wood TV Series)


© Edward Watson 2013
http://clasmerdin.blogspot.co.uk/


*

Notes & References
1. Michael Swanton, trans & ed, The Anglo Saxon Chronicle, Dent 1997. (Abingdon ms C)
2. Ibid. The Anglo Saxon Chronicle (Worcester ms D). The Abingdon ms C gives the year as 910.
3. Ibid. p.95. Possibly Bromesberrow, near Ledbury.
4. Ibid. fn p.95.
5. Ibid. p.96.
6. Ibid. Literally 'boundary gap' at an unidentified site.



* * *


Tuesday, 2 July 2013

Stafford Big Burh Day

A celebration of 1,100 years since Æthelflæd the Lady of the Mercians, daughter of King Alfred the Great, fortified Stafford as a defended settlement, or 'burh'.

 
Saturday 6 July 2013
Storytelling Parade
From 11am - Stafford Town Centre

Part of the Big Burh Day celebrations will be a colourful 'storytelling' parade where 1,100 years of Stafford's history will be recreated by a Celebration Pageant involving community groups, organisations and businesses parading through the town in elaborate costumes showing off Stafford’s rich heritage.

Stafford Ancient High House
The parade will set off at 11am and wind through Stafford Town Centre, taking approximately 45 minutes to complete.

There is an opportunity for the public to take part in the celebration and help to tell the story of Stafford from the founding of the burh in 913, to last year's Olympic Torch Relay. Two stone plinths will also be unveiled marking Stafford’s 1,100 birthday and Queen Elizabeth II memorable visit in 2006.

Following the Storytelling parade in the morning and afternoon's local music showcase, Stafford's Big Burh Day will finish with a free celebratory music concert in Market Square.

Plan of Stafford in 1610 - John Speede



See:






* * *


Copyright © 2013 Edward Watson
http://clasmerdin.blogspot.co.uk/




Friday, 28 June 2013

The Giant's Cauldron

Merlin and Stonehenge
Part VI


In the stories of Preiddeu Annwn, Culhwch and Olwen and The Second Branch of the Mabinogion we see the common theme of a raid on the Otherworld (Ireland) involving a magic cauldron and release of an exalted prisoner, with only seven returning in two of the tales. But we are searching for the theft of a stone circle, not a cauldron.

Is Geoffrey's translation of the Latin 'chorea gigantum' as the 'Giant's Dance' correct?
Geoffrey claims to have translated a book from the native British tongue into Latin which had been previously translated from Latin by Walter, Archdeacon of Oxford. If ever there was a recipe for a literary disaster it was here. It certainly wouldn't be the only occasion that Geoffrey mistranslated a name; did he get the name of the Giant's Dance wrong?

The Welsh name for Stonehenge is 'Cor Y Cewri' which is rendered as 'Chorea gigantum' in Medieval Latin by Geoffrey or literally 'The Giants's Choir' in English. Antiquarians, such as John Wood and John Smith, used the name 'Choir Gaur'. In Stonehenge, A Temple Restor'd to the British Druids, William Stukeley said, "I had rather chuse to think choir gaur in Welsh, truly means, the great church; the cathedral, in our way of speaking." Indeed, poetic licence permits some variation; this is typically translated as the Giants Dance, Round, Circle or Ring. One seems at liberty to take your pick.

Whereas I am certainly no etymologist, and the issue requires an expert opinion, I suggest an alternative name, which would fit with the stories of Preiddeu Annwn, Culhwch and Olwen and The Second Branch of the Mabinogion; is it possible the correct translation of 'the Giant's Dance' should in fact be the 'giants cauldron.'

Before the suggestion is dismissed out of hand, consider that the Middle Irish word for cauldron is "Coiri," with "coire" and "caere" as alternate spellings. Afterall, according to Geoffrey, the stone circle came from Mount Killaraus in Ireland and we can justifiably expect an original Gaelic name for the monument. Let's look at one or two examples.

Pobull Fhìnn
One of the most distinctive features of the Outer Hebrides is the prevalence of the Gaelic language, brought to Scotland by colonists from Ireland towards the days of the end of the Roman Empire in Britain. By 500 AD the Gaels had established their Kingdom of Dàl Riada, centred on what is now Argyll in southwest Scotland which became known as Earra Ghàidheal, "the coastland of the Gael."

Today a stone circle on  Machrie Moor on the Isle of Arran, Inner Hedrides, is called Fingal's Cauldron Seat or 'Suidhe Coire Fhionn' in Gaelic. The inner circle, 37.9ft in diameter, is made up of eight stones which is remarkably close to the inner bluestone feature at Stonehenge

The site consists of two concentric rings of eight and fifteen granite boulders and is the largest of the stone circles at the prehistoric ceremonial site of Machrie Moor. During excavation in 1861 an empty cist, probably a robbed burial,was found in the centre of the circles. The name 'Fingal's Cauldron Seat' is said to refer to the legendary warrior and giant Fingal, boiling up his cauldron on the inner circle's stones. A stone within the circle has a hole through it, where Fingal is said to have tethered his dogs Bran and Scaolain, while he ate a meal within the inner ring.

Pobull Fhìnn is a stone circle on the Isle of North Uist in the Outer Hebrides. The stones are also known as Sòrnach Coir' Fhìnn, or 'the fireplace of Fionn's cauldron.' Near Kensaleyre in Skye we find Sòrnaichean Coir Fhìnn, 'the fireplaces of Fionn's cauldron.' Coire Fhìnn, or 'Fionn's cauldron' was used to cook the deer that he and his fellow hunters had killed.

The legendary Gaelic hero Fionn mac Cumhaill, known in English as Finn McCool the hunter-warrior of Irish mythology, also occurs in  Manx and Scottish mythologies. These ancient cooking places in wild areas are known as 'fulachta' and often attributed to Finn and his men. These sites in the Hedrides are immediately reminiscent of  the Arthur dining sites in Wales and south-west England such as Ffynnon Cegin Arthur, ‘The Spring of Arthur’s Kitchen’, in Cardiganshire; Crochan Arthur, Arthur’s Pot or Cauldron near to Arthur’s Table in Carmarthenshire; Arthur's Oven, Dartmoor; ‘Arthur’s Cups and Saucers’ at Tintagel; ‘Arthur’s Troughs’ on Bodmin Moor.

A 'giant's cauldron' fits perfectly with these landscape features associated with mythological characters Arthur and Finn, and also makes sense of the  the stories of Preiddeu Annwn, Culhwch and Olwen and The Second Branch of the Mabinogion as Geoffrey's sources for the raid on Ireland to retrieve the stone circle.

Did Geoffrey get the name of the Giant's Dance right?


Copyright © 2013 Edward Watson
http://clasmerdin.blogspot.co.uk/

* * * 


Sunday, 23 June 2013

The Raid on the Otherworld

Merlin and Stonehenge 
Part V

Does Geoffrey of Monmouth's account of the stones of the Giant's Dance transported to Salisbury Plain from Mount Killaraus in Ireland reflect an ancient tradition of the bluestones of Stonehenge coming from Pembrokeshire, south west Wales, via the Irish Sea, or a mythological account of a raid on the Otherworld?

Fact or Mythology?
Roman artefacts found in Ireland are regarded by most archaeologists as evidence of trade with Roman Britain, perhaps some are the spoils from the raiding of British coastal settlements, and not evidence of Roman conquest. It is generally accepted that a Roman invasion force never set foot on Irish soil; current archaeological evidence suggests there were no large scale military incursions and the account is entirely absent from of the works of the Roman historians.

It was not until the late 12th century that Anglo-Norman lords settled in Ireland after a force of Norman, Welsh and Flemish troops landed in Wexford in 1169 and within a short time conquered Leinster. But this was a generation after Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote his Historia Regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain) c.1136 AD, in which he claimed that Merlin brought the stone circle known as the Giant's Dance (Stonehenge) back from Mount Killaraus in Ireland and set them up on Salisbury Plain using his magic. There appears to be no historical record of an invasion of Ireland by the English before Geoffrey's time.

Geoffrey's sources have been the topic of much debate. In the story of the Giant's Dance he is clearly not following a historical Dark Age account; for example, he had no knowledge of the Saxon execution victim buried at the stone circle. But we cannot dismiss the possibility that he clawed into the faintest memories of an ancient tradition extant since the construction of Stonehenge as unlikely as this may seem.

In Celtic mythology we found three accounts of a raid on Ireland, as a euphemised form of the Otherworld. These three tales share the recurrent central theme of the pursuit of a magic cauldron from across the sea. The earliest of these tales, Preiddeu Annwn (The Spoils of Annwn), which survives in the 14th-century manuscript Llyfr Taliesin (Book of Taliesin). The archaic text of this obscure poem has been dated to anywhere between the 9th and 12th century, but certainly free of Galfridian influence.1
The Spoils of the Otherworld 
Preiddeu Annwn is a sea-borne raid on an Otherworld stronghold known by several evocative names, or alternatively several strongholds with various names, by Arthur and his retinue in three full loads of the ship Prydwen. The first stanza mentions “the prison of Gweir in Kaer Sidi, throughout the account of Pwyll and Pryderi.” Gweir is known from the  Tryoedd Ynys Prydein (Triads of the Isle of Britain) as one of three exalted prisoners along with Llyr Lledyeith and Mabon uab Modron.2

The purpose of the mission is to release the exalted prisoner and retrieve the cauldron of the chief of Annwn from the Four-Peaked Fortress: a cauldron with a dark ridge around its border and pearls, kindled by the breath of nine maidens, which will not boil the food of a coward;

“The flashing sword of Lleawch has been lifted to it, 
And in the hand of Lleminawc it was left. 
And before the door of hell lamps burned.” 

Kaer Sidi, the Mound Fortress, is rendered as one of several names for the Otherworld stronghold. The name may come from Old Irish síde, from nominative síd, "gods" or "fairy-folk," or the mound or dwelling place of such folk. The release of Gweir and the theft of the cauldron is a costly adventure; at the end of each stanza, but the last two, the storyteller informs us that except seven, none returned.3

Both Pwyll and Pryderi feature in The First Branch of The Mabinogi. The collection of tales known as the Mabinogion, which includes the Four Branches, four native tales and three romances, was compiled between the 11th and 13th century but contain much older material, as shown by inclusion of the material of the Raid on the Otherworld in the Second Branch.

In the First Branch, Pwyll undergoes a series of magical trials before emerging as the‘Head of Annwn’ and the final section of the Branch sees the birth of the child Pryderi who disappears on the night of his birth. When he is found he is given the name Gwri Wallt Euryn ‘Gwri Golden Hair’ which appears to represent a local variant of the cult of Maponus.4

The Assembly of the Wondrous Head
In the Second Branch of The Mabinogi, Branwen daughter of Llyr, Brân the Blessed (Bendigeidfran) son of Llŷr is substituted for Arthur as the High King of the Island of the Mighty. Brân and his army embark on a campaign to rescue Branwen, his sister, who has been betrothed to Matholwch, King of Ireland. They have a son named Gwern. After humiliating Branwen by forcing her to bake in the court and tearing up meat, after three years of punishment she sends a message to Brân tied to the wing of a starling. Brân receives the message while in Caer Seint (Segontium) and sets off to Ireland. In this tale Brân is clearly of gigantic stature as he wades across the sea to Ireland, crossing the rivers Lli and the Archen, carrying all the minstrels on his back.

The Irish are given a magical cauldron by Brân which has the property of bringing slain warriors back to life; the mysterious Peir Dedani, or Cauldron of Rebirth:

“I will give you this cauldron, and the peculiarity of the cauldron is this: a man who is killed today and thrown in the cauldron, by the next day he will be as good as he was at his best, except he will not be able to talk.”


Brân obtained this cauldron from an Irishman named Llasar Llaes Gyfewid, who had escaped from the white-hot Iron House, he met on top of a tumulus above a lake in Ireland, called "The Lake of the Cauldron". After seeing the carnage of the men of the Island of the Mighty and realising he is the cause, Efnisien, Brân's quarrelsome half brother who started the war by thrusting Branwen's son into the fire, hides amongst the corpses and gets himself thrown into the Cauldron of Rebirth and stretches himself out until the cauldron breaks into four pieces, breaking his heart at the same time.

And after that, victory went to the men of the Island of the Mighty. But the victory saw no more than the escape of just seven men; Pryderi, Manawydan, Glifieu Eil Taran, Taliesin and Ynawg, Gruddieu son of Muriel and Heilyn son of Gwyn the Old. Brân, having been mortally wounded in the foot with a poisoned spear, orders his head to be cut off by his own men. They carry Bran's living head, which continues to talk to them, as they take it to London where it is to be buried in the White Hill. On their journey they partake in ‘The Assembly of the Wondrous Head’ at the island of Gwales where they rest for eighty years in pleasant forgetfulness. Gwales is here synonymous with  Kaer Sidi, in the pre-Christian concept of the Island Otherworld.5

The Oldest Arthurian Tale
The tale of 'How Culhwch won Olwen', commonly classified as the Oldest Arthurian tale, is included in the compilation of Middle Welsh texts found in two late-medieval manuscripts, a complete version in the Llyfr Coch Hergest ( Red Book of Hergest) and a fragmented version in the earlier Llyfr Gwyn Rhydderch (White Book of Rhydderch). The Red and White book manuscripts were complied in the 14th century, yet from orthographic evidence scholars have established the tale of Culhwch was written earlier than 1100 AD and is the most archaic text in the Mabinogion collection.

In Culhwch, Arthur and his warband is presented with forty difficult, or impossible tasks, anoethau, to complete as the price for obtaining the hand of Olwen, the daughter of Ysbaddaden chief-giant, for his nephew Culhwch in marriage. In this tale Mabon is again a prisoner and must be released before Arthur and his band of warriors can hunt the supernatural boar Twrch Trwyth. The chief-giant stipulates that Arthur and his huntsmen are required to retrieve “the comb and shears that are between the two ears of Twrch Trwyth son of Taredd Wledig, the only comb and shears in the world wherewith my hair may be dressed, so exceeding stiff it is.” Because of his wickedness Prince Taredd has been turned into a boar, along with seven of his men, who are referred to as his piglets.6

The hunting of the great boar Troynt, a Latinisation of the Welsh Trwyd, by Arthur and his dog Cabal  is recorded in the Mirabilia (Wonders of Britain) appended to the 9th century Historia Brittonum. An even earlier reference to the hunting of the Twrch Trwyth is found in the Gorchan of Cynfelyn attached to the epic poem Y Gododdin of Aneirin. This gorchan is indeed ancient and has been dated to the arrival of the Y Gododdin in Gwynedd in the early 7th century.7

“The cauldron of Diwrnach the Irishman, the overseer of Odgar son of Aedd king of Ireland, to boil meat for thy wedding guests” is another task set by the chief-giant. A variant of the tale of the raid on the Otherworld (Ireland) first found in Preiddeu Annwn is included in Culhwch to attain the cauldron of the Head of Annwn, Pair Pen Annwn, which Arthur achieves in the later tale with rather more success. This cauldron surely equates with the Peir Dadeni, the Cauldron of Rebirth, from the Second Branch of the Mabinogi.

In Preiddeu Annwn, above, we have seen the cauldron was grasped in the episode with “the sword of Lluch Lleawch.” It has been suggested that Lluch lleawc may be a muddle of a name.8 There is clearly much confusion here and the lines in question in Preiddeu Annwn may in fact contain a garbled version of the name of the weapon, the “sword of Lleawch” (cledyf lluch lleawc); 'lluch' and 'lleawc' may then be taken to be separate adjectives meaning "flashing" and "death-dealing." Further, the mention of 'llaw leminawc' in the next line of Preiddeu Annwn may derive from a misinterpretation of 'cledyf lluch....llaw leminawc' which could have given rise to the persona of Llwch Llaw Leminawc/Llawwynnawc who became associated with Llwch Garmon, who became confused with the similar character of Llenlleawc emerging from a variant interpretation of the same lines of the poem.9

Lluch Lleawc has been seen as a variant of the name of Llwch Llawwynnawc (Lloch Llawwynnyawc) who is also invoked by Culhwch. Llawwynnyawc of Culhwch is often seen as synonymous with Lleminawc of Preiddeu Annwn, adding further confirmation that the theft of the cauldron from the Otherworld is the same episode. Llwch Llawwynnawc has been interpreted as 'Lug of the Striking-Hand', or 'Lug of the Windy-Hand', common epithets for the Irish deity.

Perhaps it is is possible to untangle this confusion when we consider that the word 'leminawc' is an adjective meaning 'leaper' or 'leaping one' used in reference to an attacker and very aptly may be an epithet for Arthur in this instance. In prophetic poems it can refer to the deliverer. Marged Haycock offers an alternative interpretation of this passage without the need for the Irish divinity Lug, this is not to say that Arthur was not accompanied on his Otherworld journeys with deities from the Celtic pantheon,10 but there is no reason not to see this slaying as being executed by Arthur himself with Caledfwlch his own sword: “The flashing sword of death-dealing was thrust into it, and it was left in the hand of the leaping one...” [i.e. the attacker, Arthur].11

In our stories we see the common theme of a raid on the Otherworld (Ireland) involving a magic cauldron, belonging to a dignitary; King, Head of Annwn or Chief-giant, and the release of an exalted prisoner, with only seven returning in two of the tales. Furthermore, Geoffrey fails to mention Arthur's involvement with the theft of the Giant's Dance from Ireland simply because he had not yet appeared on the scene.

But we should be looking for the theft of a stone circle not a cauldron.


Next: The Giant's Cauldron


Copyright © 2013 Edward Watson
http://clasmerdin.blogspot.co.uk/

*


Notes & References
1. John T Koch, Celtic Culture, ABC – Clio, 2006.
2. Rachel Bromwich, ed. trans. Tryoedd Ynys Prydein, (The Triads of the Isle of Britain), University of Wales Press.
3. Sarah Higley, Text and Translation, PREIDDEU ANNWN: “The Spoils of Annwn", The Camelot Project.
4. Will Parker, The Four Branches of the Mabinogi, Bardic Press, 2007.
5. Ibid.
6. Rachel Bromwich and D Simon Evans, eds. Culhwch and Olwen: An Edition and Study of the Oldest Arthurian Tale, University of Wales Press, 1992.
7. Thomas Green, Concepts of Arthur, Tempus, 2007.
8.  Sarah Higley, op.cit.
9. Patrick Sims-Williams, Irish Influence of Medieval Welsh Literature, Oxford University Press, 2011.
10. In The Black Book of Carmarthen poem 'Pa gur yv y Porthaur?' (What man is the gate-keeper?), or simply 'Pa Gur,' is a dialogue between Arthur, the leader of a war band, and Glewlwyd the gate-keeper, closely parallels Culhwch's attempt to enter Arthur's court, with the listing of Arthur's warriors; Mabon (Maponus), Manawydan, the son of Llŷr, and Llwch Llawynnog (Lugh?). Pa Gur breaks off before the end but it appears to be the original mythological account of Arthur's battles rather than the garbled account included in Chapter 56 of the Historia Brittonum with historical battles wrongly attributed to Arthur, i.e. Chester and Badon.
11. Marged Haycock, Legendary Poems from the Book of Taliesin, CMCS, 2007, p.444. See note p.384.

>100<

* * *


Monday, 27 May 2013

Merlin and Stonehenge: Stones from the West

Part IV

It is indeed a remarkable coincidence that the modern account of the construction of Stonehenge is reflected in Geoffrey of Monmouth's 12th century legendary history which claimed  the rocks of the Giant's Dance were foreign to Salisbury Plain almost 900 years before modern science identified the source.

In Geoffrey of Monmouth's account, as a fitting monument to the British nobles murdered by Hengist's Saxon's, Merlin's suggests that they should send for the Giant's Dance in Killaraus in Ireland. Aurelius burst into laughter, and said, "How is it possible to remove such vast stones from so distant a country, as if Britain was not furnished with stones fit for the work?"   Does Geoffrey's account of the Giant's Dance being brought from Ireland portray an ancient memory of a Bluestone monument brought from south-west Wales?

Merlin dismantling the Giant's Dance,
from Wace, Roman de Brut. Egerton 3028
The oldest known depiction of Stonehenge is from a manuscript of the Roman de Brut by Wace in the British Library, copied in England between July 1338 and June 1340. It is often described as showing a giant helping Merlin build Stonehenge while ordinary people watch on amazed. But the illustration's place in the manuscript suggests that it is actually Merlin dismantling the Giant's Ring in Killaraus. Curiously, Wace is the first author to mention the Round Table, a name used for many prehistoric Arthurian sites.

As the most magnificent Neolithic structure in Europe, Stonehenge requires no introduction, however, for clarity, I will recap on the composition of the monument. Enclosed within a ditch and bank is a circle of 56 Aubrey Holes, today identified by white discs in the grass. Next, working our way toward the centre of the monument, is a now incomplete ring of huge sarsen megaliths, topped by lintels, thought to have once formed a continuous ring of 30 stones. Within this sarsen ring is a rough circle of smaller stones, known as bluestones, the largest estimated to weigh about four tons. Next is the massive horseshoe arrangement comprising five sarsen trilithons, three still erect, the largest estimated to weigh around 50 tons, graduating in height toward the direction of the mid-winter sunset. Within this arrangement is a horseshoe setting of finely worked bluestones, mirroring the sarsen settings; circle, horseshoe, graduating in height towards the same point.

Several of the bluestones show evidence of having been part of a previous structure, similar to the lintel topped sarsen trilithon arrangement at Stonehenge; stone 150, now lying flat in the Bluestone Circle and partly overlain by stone 32, possesses two well-made mortices, about 41 inches apart between centres, evidently used as a lintel; the other, stone 36, is one of the finest worked bluestones at Stonehenge. It was discovered in 1929, exhumed in 1954 by Richard Atkinson for further examination and then reburied. This stone also possesses mortices with clear signs of erosion caused by windrock during its life as a lintel on a trilithon arrangement.35

Bluestone 36 - exhumed in 1954
The spacing of the mortice holes on stones 150 and 36 do not span any of the known bluestone settings at Stonehenge. Neither do they permit a trilithon structure to be recreated using the surviving bluestone uprights from the horseshoe that have traces of tenons on top, most of this dressed away, and must have formed uprights in some other bluestone trilithon arrangement. Two other bluestones warrant our attention; the broken stump, 66, has a projecting tongue; while stone 68 has a grove running down its entire length. Did they once fit together? 36

Where did this elegant Bluestone monument stand? 

Bluestone chips discovered in 1947 by JFS Stone between Fargo Plantation and the west end of the Cursus inspired the theory that a circle of bluestones once stood there but archaeological investigations have failed to find it. However, it now seems an earlier bluestone monument stood in the opposite direction on the west bank of the river Avon. In 2009 excavations by the Stonehenge Riverside Project (SRP) discovered the site of a small monument comprising 24-26 stoneholes, of similar size to the Stonehenge bluestones, at the far end of the Stonehenge Avenue at West Amesbury and may mark the disembarkment point of the bluestones on a water-borne journey up the Avon past the barrows at Hengistbury Head in Christchurch harbour. SRP named this putative monument 'Bluestonehenge'.37

The monument was initially dated to around 2,900 BC from a chiselled flint arrow head found at the site. Around the same time, or a little earlier, 56 bluestones would have stood in the Aubrey Holes as the first stone monument at Stonehenge marking the first burials at the monument, fuelling the romantic notion of two bluestone monuments linked by the Avenue.

It appears Bluestonehenge was dismantled around 2,470–2,280 BC, a date obtained from an antler pick found in the henge ditch at the site. Around this time Stonehenge underwent a massive rebuilding programme, when around 2,500 BC the sarsen circle and trilithons were erected, with again further reconstruction around 2,200 BC. The bluestones  from the 56 Aubrey Hole were rearranged in the two settings within the sarsens, i.e. the Bluestone Circle and Horseshoe, together with an estimated further 26 bluestones from somewhere else, possibly Bluestonehenge, providing a total of around 80-82 bluestones, the number usually said to have stood in the final configuration at Stonehenge.38 The numbers add up, but the evidence of the previously worked bluestones (mortice spans) does not and, contrary to reports, to date no actual bluestone has yet been found at West Amesbury.39

Insana Substructio
Such was the mystery of the stones of Stonehenge that the first antiquarians suspected they were artificial and not natural; “fine sand cemented together by a glewy sort of matter.40

John Leland, 16th century antiquarian to Henry VIII, does not include the site of Stonehenge in his 'Itinerary', but elsewhere repeats Geoffrey of Monmouth’s story but with the variation that Merlin obtains the stones from a place on Salisbury Plain and not Ireland.41

The sarsen stones are from a local source but the 'bluestones' have long been known to be foreign to Salisbury Plain and the name is used today, rather unsatisfactorily, by geologists as a generic term for all the non-local stones at the monument. For many years the source of the bluestones at Stonehenge baffled eminent Victorian investigators such as Maskelyne, Cunnington, Teal and Judd. However, in 1923, Herbert Thomas from the Geological Survey published a paper in The Antiquaries Journal in which he claimed to have sourced some bluestone types to rock outcrops from Carn Menyn in the Preseli Hills in south-west Wales. Thomas went on to speculate that the transportation method to Salisbury Plain was human, but not all agree:

“Stonehenge is composed of two types of stone, a consistent group of heavy sarsens from the Avebury region eighteen miles to the north; and an inconsistent muddle of much smaller dolerites and different stones from the Preseli mountains of south-west Wales 140 miles directly to the west. There is continuing controversy about the method by which the bluestones reached Salisbury Plain. There is almost none about the sarsens.42

Richard Atkinson proposed a journey by sea for the bluestones, embarking from Milford Haven, following the South Wales coastline along the Bristol Channel, up the Severn Estuary, then down the Bristol Avon and finally the short distance overland to Salisbury Plain. Alternatively, he suggested, they could have followed a longer route along the south-west coast of England, rounding Land's End and journey up the Hampshire Avon, past Hengistbury Head to Amesbury. Atkinson carried out successful experiments with rafts.43 The route and method certainly seem plausible. Anyone doubting the capabilities of Neolithic man is referred to studies of Prehistoric trade routes.

The seaborne bluestone routes
Recent petrological studies have confirmed that the bluestones did come from the Preseli Hills in South Wales but not all from Carn Menyn (Carn Meini) as proposed by Herbert Thomas. Indeed, ongoing studies by Dr Richard Bevins, Keeper of Geology at Amgueddfa Cymru, and Dr Rob Ixer, University of Leicester, have identified the rock outcrop from certain types of Stonehenge bluestone, some of the rhyolites, as Pont Saeson to the north of Mynydd Preseli. It is unlikely that they would have transported the Pont Saeson stones in a southerly direction up slopes and over the Preseli Hills to Milford Haven when they are much nearer the River Nevern (Afon Nyfer) which skirts the northern slopes of the Preseli Hills before discharging into Newport Bay and the Irish Sea.44

Irish in South Wales
An Irish influence has existed in South Wales since prehistory as attested by the portal dolmens, such as Carreg Samson, near Trefin, and Pentre Ifan, near Newport, reminiscent of the megalithic monuments of Ireland. There appears to have been an axe-factory  at the eastern end of the Preseli Hills producing polished stone axes of spotted dolerite of such high quality that they were in demand as far afield as Antrim and Salisbury Plain. Furthermore, Preseli was on the trade route of the gold mined from the Wicklow Hills, Ireland, to Wessex.

This ancient trade route persisted and later Pembrokeshire lay on the pilgrimage route of the Celtic saints who travelled between Ireland and Rome and the Holy Lands. During the 4th century an Irish tribe, the Deisi, from County Meath in Ireland, migrated to Pembrokeshire under their leader Eochaid Allmuir, and established a royal dynasty which was to rule Demetae (modern Dyfed) in south-west Wales for some five centuries. The medieval Irish narrative The Expulsion of the Déisi, from the Cycles of the Kings, provides the Deisi with a mythical noble origin as the heirs to a dynasty expelled from Tara. Evidently there is some doubt over the historicity of this account, but it has been suggested that the term “déisi” is interchangeable with the Old Irish term, “aithechthúatha” meaning "rent-paying tribes" or "vassal communities", which may well be the origin of the Attacotti who are reported attacking Roman Britain in the mid-4th century.45

What did Geoffrey know?
Geoffrey’s account seems to have been based on an earlier tradition of the transportation of the stones from a site across the sea after battling the Irish. Yet again, we find Geoffrey's story seems to contain a remarkable set of coincidences:

  • There is clear evidence that the bluestones at Stonehenge formerly stood in a trilithon arrangement at an unknown site, as the span of the mortices do not match any known bluestone configuration at Stonehenge, the Aubrey Holes or Bluestonehenge; this arrangement must have been dismantled from some unknown location before their use on Salisbury Plain.
  • Significantly, Geoffrey has Uther's forces battling the Irish in Pembrokeshire over the removal of the stones; the Irish tribe known as the Deisi established a dynasty in South Wales and may have been raiding Roman Britain as the Attacotti in the mid-4th century.
  • Remarkably, Geoffrey has the stones of Stonehenge coming from oversea from Ireland; at least some of the bluestones must have been transported via the Irish Sea.
  • And finally, Merlin, according to Geoffrey, the architect of Stonehenge, was born some 20 miles from the bluestone site at the town of Kaermerdin (Merlin's fortress), modern Carmarthen, named after him; as a native of Pembrokeshire he would have had intimate knowledge of the Giant's Dance.


Copyright © 2013 Edward Watson
http://clasmerdin.blogspot.co.uk/

*

Next: Merlin and Stonehenge Part V: The Raid on the Otherworld


Notes & References
35. Atkinson, Stonehenge, Penguin, Revised Edition 1990, pp.51-53.
36. Ibid. p.55.
37. Mike Parker Pearson, Stonehenge, 2012.
38. Ibid.
39. British Archaeology magazine Issue 110, Jan/Feb 2010, News - Phase 2.
40. Camden, on Wiltshire in Britannia, 1610.
41. John Leland, Commentarii de Scriptoribus Britannicis, published by Anthony Hall in 1709.
42. Aubrey Burl, Transportation or Glaciation? in Great Stone Circles: Fables, Fictions, Facts, Yale University Press, 1999, p.107.
43. Atkinson, op.cit., pp.105-116.
44. 'New Discovery ‘will rewrite Stonehenge’s history' - University Of Leicester, 25 February 2011.
45. Philip Rance, Attacotti, Déisi and Magnus Maximus: the Case for Irish Federates in Late Roman Britain, Britannia 32, 2001.

* * *